Horst Weyerhaeuser, He Jun:
Assessing Pro-Poor Mechanisms of Payment for Environment Services from Forests: Lessons Learned from Government"=Led Programs in Southwest China


World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Centre for Mountain Ecosystem Studies, China

Upland agriculture and watershed conservation are often juxtaposed in China's sustainable development discourse. Intensive upland agriculture sustains the livelihoods of a majority of China's poorest farming communities, but is perceived as environmentally destructive. Deteriorating watershed quality has prompted efforts to convert agricultural land to forest and grassland, which reduces farmers' productive land. Resolving the impasse between upland food security and rural development, on the one hand, and the need to control watershed degradation, on the other, has become one of China's most pressing development challenges.

More recently, efforts to intertwine upland development interests with downstream conservation priorities have taken a new form. Recognizing farmers' lack of conservation incentives, government agencies and industry groups in China have begun to experiment with innovative payment schemes that attempt to offset farmers' opportunity costs for taking land out of agricultural production. These schemes range from national (e.g., the Sloping Land Conversion Program & the Ecological Forest Compensation Program) to catchment (e.g., hydropower station-community agreements) in scale.

This paper provides an overview of the promise and pitfalls of payment mechanisms for watershed services in China's upland areas, drawing on a variety of case studies from several provinces. Although preliminary surveys and experience with actual arrangements have demonstrated their potential in China, payment schemes are regularly hindered by a lack of the awareness, market infrastructure, and institutional support necessary for their success.

The stakes are high, and continued experimentation and research is needed. Mechanisms that appropriately reward upland farmers for conservation provide an enduring match between upland development interests and watershed conservation. Failure to provide adequate rewards and appropriate policies and markets threatens farmers' food security and livelihoods, and consequently the viability of conservation programs.

Keywords: China, Ecological Forest Compensation Program (EFCP), Payment for Environmental Services (PES), Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP), Watershed Protection


Contact Address: He Jun, World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF)3rd Floor Library Building Kunming Institute of Botany Hielongtan, 650204 Kunming, China, e-mail: h.jun@cgiar.org
Andreas Deininger, November 2007