\documentclass[english,german]{scrartcl}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1.75cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm,headheight=0.8cm,headsep=0.5cm,footskip=0.5cm}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{url}
\urlstyle{same}
\newcommand\email{\begingroup \urlstyle{same}\Url}\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{units}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{wasysym} % enable use of \permil instead of \textperthousand
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage{hyphenat}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{mdwlist}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\relax}
\usepackage{index}
\newindex{key}{kdx}{knd}{Keywords}
\newindex{author}{idx}{ind}{Authors}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\fancyfoot{}
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\ifpdf
%\usepackage[activate]{pdfcprot}
%\usepackage[owner=Tapioka, print=true, copy=true, edit=false, annotate=false,set]{pdfcrypt}
%encryption: not supported any more (since pdftex 1.10)
\usepackage[pdftex]{thumbpdf}
\usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{pdftitle={Judiciary System; Pesticides, Sustainable Development; Economy},pdfauthor={Igor Gomes de Araújo, Luciana Ramos Jordão, Barbara Luiza Rodrigues, Victória Cardoso Carrijo, Thays Dias Silva, Rebeca Barbosa Moura, Letícia Versiane Arantes Dantas, Niury Ohan  Pereira Magno},pdfsubject={Tropentag 2020: Abstract},pdfkeywords={Economy, judiciary system, Pesticides, Sustainable Development},pdfpagemode=None,colorlinks=true}
\else
\usepackage{textcomp}
\fi
\begin{document}
\ifpdf
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2020.jpg}}}
\else
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2020.eps}}}
\fi
\hfill
\parbox[b]{13.4cm}{\centering \large{\textbf{Tropentag, September 9-11, 2020, virtual conference}}\\[1ex] \Large{``Food and nutrition security and its resilience\\ to global crises''\\[2ex]}}
\hspace{0.1cm}
\begin{center}
\Large{\textbf{Judiciary System; Pesticides, Sustainable Development; Economy\footnote{\textbf{Contact Address:} Luciana Ramos Jordão, State University of Goiás, Law College (Southeast Campus: Morrinhos), Av. Perimetral Norte, n. 4356, c. 88b, Alto da Boa Vista, 74445500~Goiânia, Brazil, \mbox{e-mail}: \email{luciana.jordao@ueg.br}}\\[0.8ex]}}
\normalsize{\textsc{Igor Gomes de Araújo, Luciana Ramos Jordão, Barbara Luiza Rodrigues, Victória Cardoso Carrijo, Thays Dias Silva, Rebeca Barbosa Moura, Letícia Versiane Arantes Dantas, Niury Ohan  Pereira Magno}}
\end{center}
\begin{itemize*}
\item[]{\small{\textit{State University of Goiás, Law College (Southeast Campus: Morrinhos), }}}
\end{itemize*}
\index[author]{Araújo, Igor Gomes de}
\index[author]{Jordão, Luciana Ramos}
\index[author]{Rodrigues, Barbara Luiza}
\index[author]{Carrijo, Victória Cardoso}
\index[author]{Silva, Thays Dias}
\index[author]{Moura, Rebeca Barbosa}
\index[author]{Dantas, Letícia Versiane Arantes}
\index[author]{Pereira Magno, Niury Ohan }
\begin{center}
\vspace{1.1cm}
\textbf{Abstract}
\begin{abstract}
\normalsize{
The growing authorisation to pesticides has raised questions among Brazilian people concerning to the consequences that unadvised usage may have on health, food safety, nutrition and environmental protection. President Bolsonaro and an important part of National Congress were elected, among other reasons, because of their promises to improve economic development and make access to pesticides easier and simpler. However, in Brazil, the Constitution consider health, environmental protection, social justice and human dignity as human rights and principles that may limit and guide decisions on private or public spheres. Thus, when a litigation is taken to Judiciary, it must follow the main hermeneutic line stablished on the Constitution. In order to evaluate the application of these principles by the Judiciary system, this research analyses the final decisions given by two Brazilian courts, responsible by the states of Goiás and Tocantins. These states have their economies especially focused on agricultural activities. Due to economic relevance of rural activities in Goiás and Tocantins, it is important to consider the enforcement of Constitution when litigation involves discussions about pesticides. After all, if the Constitution commands on social justice, health and environmental protection, the courts need to rule accordingly. Thus, this paper evaluates court decisions in order to understand the reasons discussed on the cases by using statistical analysis concerning to fundaments for ruling, damages, rural activities developed on the areas and conditions of families and workers. The Judiciary is the last frontier on avoiding destructive policies to take place, especially when profit surpasses human rights. However, the research identified a small amount of actions that do not reflect the quantity of problems, the number of people negative affected by pesticides or the importance of rural activity for the analysed states. The paper raises hypothesis about the reasons why, even though there are many complaints on pesticides usage, many cases do not go to court. }

\vspace{0.5cm}
\end{abstract}
\end{center}
\noindent \textbf{Keywords:} Economy, judiciary system, Pesticides, Sustainable Development
\index[key]{Economy}
\index[key]{Judiciary system}
\index[key]{Pesticides}
\index[key]{Sustainable!Development}
\end{document}
