\documentclass[english,german]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1.75cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm,headheight=0.8cm,headsep=0.5cm,footskip=0.5cm}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{url}
\urlstyle{same}
\newcommand\email{\begingroup \urlstyle{same}\Url}\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{units}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{wasysym} % enable use of \permil instead of \textperthousand
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage{arabtex}
\usepackage{hyphenat}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{mdwlist}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\relax}
\usepackage{index}
\newindex{key}{kdx}{knd}{Keywords}
\newindex{author}{idx}{ind}{Authors}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\fancyfoot{}
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\ifpdf
%\usepackage[activate]{pdfcprot}
%\usepackage[owner=Tapioka, print=true, copy=true, edit=false, annotate=false,set]{pdfcrypt}
%encryption: not supported any more (since pdftex 1.10)
\usepackage[pdftex]{thumbpdf}
\usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{pdftitle={Social"=ecological Linkages in Protected Area: the Case of Natma Taung National Park, Myanmar},pdfauthor={Pyi Soe Aung, Jürgen Pretzsch},pdfsubject={Tropentag 2016: Abstract},pdfkeywords={Coevolution, ecosystem services, protected area, social-ecological system},pdfpagemode=None,colorlinks=true}
\else
\usepackage{ae}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\fi
\begin{document}
\ifpdf
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.jpg}}}
\else
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.eps}}}
\fi
\hfill
\parbox[b]{13.4cm}{\centering \large{\textbf{Tropentag, September 18-21, 2016, Vienna, Austria}}\\[1ex] \Large{``Solidarity in a competing world ---\\fair use of resources''\\[2ex]}}
\hspace{0.1cm}
\begin{center}
\Large{\textbf{Social"=ecological Linkages in Protected Area: the Case of Natma Taung National Park, Myanmar\footnote{\textbf{Contact Address:} Pyi Soe Aung, Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, Pienner Straße 7, 01737~Tharandt, Germany, \mbox{e-mail}: \email{pyi_soe.aung@tu-dresden.de}}\\[0.8ex]}}
\normalsize{\textsc{Pyi Soe Aung$^{1}$, Jürgen Pretzsch$^{2}$}}
\end{center}
\begin{itemize*}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{1}$Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, Germany}}}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{2}$Technische Universität Dresden, Inst. of International Forestry and Forest Products: Tropical Forestry, Germany}}}
\end{itemize*}
\index[author]{Aung, Pyi Soe}
\index[author]{Pretzsch, Jürgen}
\begin{center}
\vspace{1.1cm}
\textbf{Abstract}
\begin{abstract}
\normalsize{
The debate between conservation and development is still considered as major challenges in protected area management. These challenges increase particularly in the tropics, where most protected areas are located in rural area and local people are highly dependent on forests for their livelihoods. Restricting access to the forest resources by protected area creates tensions between park managers and local people, and thereby limits local support and participation in conservation. The growing literatures of resilience and coevolution concept provide further options to integrate local people in conservation planning. From coevolutionary point of view, protected areas are integrated systems, in which social system and ecological system are linked together and co"=evolved over a long time. Therefore, understanding the linkages between these two systems will help protected area managers to develop target oriented strategies that are adaptive to local situations. Using social"=ecological coevolution model as an analytical framework, this study will explore how the local people are linked together with the ecological systems conserved by protected area. To analyse this linkage, a case study will be taken in Natma Taung national park, Myanmar, where local Chin ethnic communities are traditionally living close to the park. A total of 90 households from three village communities will be selected in order to analyse how local people depend on the ecosystem services provided by the national park, what types of local knowledge do they have to use these services, and how the local institutions control to sustain these services. Field surveys will be conducted from May to June 2016. Both economic and social valuation methods will be applied to determine local dependency on park resources. Field observations and focus group discussions will be used to understand local ecological knowledge and institutional settings.}

\vspace{0.5cm}
\end{abstract}
\end{center}
\noindent \textbf{Keywords:} Coevolution, ecosystem services, protected area, social"=ecological system
\index[key]{Coevolution}
\index[key]{Ecosystem services}
\index[key]{Protected area}
\index[key]{Social"=ecological system}
\end{document}
