\documentclass[english,german]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1.75cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm,headheight=0.8cm,headsep=0.5cm,footskip=0.5cm}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{url}
\urlstyle{same}
\newcommand\email{\begingroup \urlstyle{same}\Url}\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{units}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{wasysym} % enable use of \permil instead of \textperthousand
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage{arabtex}
\usepackage{hyphenat}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{mdwlist}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\relax}
\usepackage{index}
\newindex{key}{kdx}{knd}{Keywords}
\newindex{author}{idx}{ind}{Authors}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\fancyfoot{}
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\ifpdf
%\usepackage[activate]{pdfcprot}
%\usepackage[owner=Tapioka, print=true, copy=true, edit=false, annotate=false,set]{pdfcrypt}
%encryption: not supported any more (since pdftex 1.10)
\usepackage[pdftex]{thumbpdf}
\usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{pdftitle={Organic and Conventional Farming in Santa Catarina State, Brazil},pdfauthor={Rosaura Gazzola, Eliane Gonçalves Gomes, Geraldo da Silva e Souza, Alcido Elenor Wander},pdfsubject={Tropentag 2016: Abstract},pdfkeywords={Conventional Agriculture, Gender, Income, Organic Agriculture, regional Data, Regional Economics Measurement},pdfpagemode=None,colorlinks=true}
\else
\usepackage{ae}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\fi
\begin{document}
\ifpdf
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.jpg}}}
\else
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.eps}}}
\fi
\hfill
\parbox[b]{13.4cm}{\centering \large{\textbf{Tropentag, September 18-21, 2016, Vienna, Austria}}\\[1ex] \Large{``Solidarity in a competing world ---\\fair use of resources''\\[2ex]}}
\hspace{0.1cm}
\begin{center}
\Large{\textbf{Organic and Conventional Farming in Santa Catarina State, Brazil\footnote{\textbf{Contact Address:} Alcido Elenor Wander, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), National Rice and Beans Research Center (CNPAF), Rodovia GO-462, km 12, 75375-000~Santo Antonio de Goias, Brazil, \mbox{e-mail}: \email{alcido.wander@embrapa.br}}\\[0.8ex]}}
\normalsize{\textsc{Rosaura Gazzola$^{1}$, Eliane Gonçalves Gomes$^{2}$, Geraldo da Silva e Souza$^{3}$, Alcido Elenor Wander$^{4}$}}
\end{center}
\begin{itemize*}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{1}$Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Secretary of Management and Institutional Development (SGI), Brazil}}}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{2}$Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Secretary of Management and Institutional Development (SGI), Brazil}}}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{3}$Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Secretary of Management and Institutional Development (SGI), Brazil}}}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{4}$Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), National Rice and Beans Research Center (CNPAF), Brazil}}}
\end{itemize*}
\index[author]{Gazzola, Rosaura}
\index[author]{Gomes, Eliane Gonçalves}
\index[author]{da Silva e Souza, Geraldo}
\index[author]{Wander, Alcido Elenor}
\begin{center}
\vspace{1.1cm}
\textbf{Abstract}
\begin{abstract}
\normalsize{
Santa Catarina is one of Brazilian states with strong small scale agriculture. This state is also considered as one of the strongest in organic farming. Thus, this study aimed to describe the profile of organic farms in Santa Catarina state, Brazil. Therefore, microdata of farming establishments in the 2006 Agricultural Census was used. Exchange rate used was 1 R\$ = US\$ 0.4592, representing the average rate for the year 2006. In 2006 Agricultural Census, farmers were asked whether they practice organic or conventional farming. In 2006, Santa Catarina state had a total of 39,279 farms. Organic farms represent \mbox{2\,\%} (604 farms) of total farming establishments in Santa Catarina state. Regarding gender, \mbox{11\,\%} of organic farms are managed by women. Female managers lead only \mbox{1\,\%} of farms in conventional farming. Families live in urban households (\mbox{87\,\%} of organic and \mbox{90\,\%} of conventional farmers). In organic farming, \mbox{13\,\%} of household leaders live in rural areas (on farm), while in conventional farming \mbox{10\,\%} do. The average annual gross income of organic farms was R\$ 49,211.04 (US\$ 22,597.71). Compared to that, conventional farms reached R\$ 110,708.10 (US\$ 50,837.16). In general, organic farmers have higher education level than conventional farmers. While \mbox{15\,\%} of organic farmers hold a university level diploma, only \mbox{5\,\%} of conventional farmers do. Technical assistance reaches \mbox{61\,\%} of conventional farms. At the same time, \mbox{70\,\%} of organic farms have no access to technical assistance. Access to credit was used by \mbox{30\,\%} of organic farms and \mbox{50\,\%} of conventional farms. Land owners are \mbox{94\,\%} of organic farmers, against \mbox{90\,\%} of conventional farmers. Regarding cooperatives, \mbox{25\,\%} of organic farms are affiliated, while \mbox{37\,\%} conventional farmers are cooperative members.}

\vspace{0.5cm}
\end{abstract}
\end{center}
\noindent \textbf{Keywords:} Conventional Agriculture, Gender, Income, Organic Agriculture, regional Data, Regional Economics Measurement
\index[key]{Conventional Agriculture}
\index[key]{Gender}
\index[key]{Income}
\index[key]{Organic!Agriculture}
\index[key]{Regional Data}
\index[key]{Regional Economics Measurement}
\end{document}
