\documentclass[english,german]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1.75cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm,headheight=0.8cm,headsep=0.5cm,footskip=0.5cm}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{url}
\urlstyle{same}
\newcommand\email{\begingroup \urlstyle{same}\Url}\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{units}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{wasysym} % enable use of \permil instead of \textperthousand
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage{arabtex}
\usepackage{hyphenat}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{mdwlist}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\relax}
\usepackage{index}
\newindex{key}{kdx}{knd}{Keywords}
\newindex{author}{idx}{ind}{Authors}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\fancyfoot{}
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\ifpdf
%\usepackage[activate]{pdfcprot}
%\usepackage[owner=Tapioka, print=true, copy=true, edit=false, annotate=false,set]{pdfcrypt}
%encryption: not supported any more (since pdftex 1.10)
\usepackage[pdftex]{thumbpdf}
\usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{pdftitle={Combating Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Options for National and Global Governance},pdfauthor={Marcelo Carauta Montenegro Medeiros de Moraes},pdfsubject={Tropentag 2016: Abstract},pdfkeywords={Brazilian Amazon, deforestation, Indirect Land Use Change, Policies},pdfpagemode=None,colorlinks=true}
\else
\usepackage{ae}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\fi
\begin{document}
\ifpdf
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.jpg}}}
\else
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.eps}}}
\fi
\hfill
\parbox[b]{13.4cm}{\centering \large{\textbf{Tropentag, September 18-21, 2016, Vienna, Austria}}\\[1ex] \Large{``Solidarity in a competing world ---\\fair use of resources''\\[2ex]}}
\hspace{0.1cm}
\begin{center}
\Large{\textbf{Combating Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Options for National and Global Governance\footnote{\textbf{Contact Address:} Marcelo Carauta Montenegro Medeiros de Moraes, University of Hohenheim, Land Use Economics in the Tropics and Subtropics, Stuttgart, Germany, \mbox{e-mail}: \email{mcarauta@gmail.com}}\\[0.8ex]}}
\normalsize{\textsc{Marcelo Carauta Montenegro Medeiros de Moraes}}
\end{center}
\begin{itemize*}
\item[]{\small{\textit{University of Hohenheim, Land Use Economics in the Tropics and Subtropics, Germany}}}
\end{itemize*}
\index[author]{Carauta Montenegro Medeiros de Moraes, Marcelo}
\begin{center}
\vspace{1.1cm}
\textbf{Abstract}
\begin{abstract}
\normalsize{
Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has decreased over the last years but there are still several illegal activities pushing it forward. The Brazilian government is taking a prominent role in regard to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by voluntarily committing to GHG reductions. As GHG emissions from deforestation account for \mbox{60\,\%} of total Brazilian emission, the government has promoted several policies in this regard. The objective of this study is to analyse future deforestation process in Brazil to assess its main drivers and to characterise the existing political actions and agreements. Those policies are discussed in order to access its effectiveness to control the deforestation drivers over time. It is presented, through a holistic analysis, that the main drivers pushing deforestation has changed over the years and that they are intrinsically related to the development of Brazilian economy. The Brazilian government has been applying several different policies over the past year and they have been mostly successful, managing to dramatically reduce the deforestation rates. However, deforestation still remain and there are still several illegal activities pushing it forward. In this sense, to comprehend the deforestation process in the Brazilian Amazon we need to go beyond the traditional view because, while some drivers have a direct impact on deforestation, others are more difficult to capture, because they act indirectly. It is shown that some of those policies were able to reduce the deforestation; however, there are some indirect relationships that those policies could not capture. It is also highlighted some options that could improve those deforestation policies.}

\vspace{0.5cm}
\end{abstract}
\end{center}
\noindent \textbf{Keywords:} Brazilian Amazon, deforestation, Indirect Land Use Change, Policies
\index[key]{Brazilian Amazon}
\index[key]{Deforestation}
\index[key]{Indirect Land Use Change}
\index[key]{Policies}
\end{document}
