\documentclass[english,german]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1.75cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm,headheight=0.8cm,headsep=0.5cm,footskip=0.5cm}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{url}
\urlstyle{same}
\newcommand\email{\begingroup \urlstyle{same}\Url}\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{units}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{wasysym} % enable use of \permil instead of \textperthousand
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage{arabtex}
\usepackage{hyphenat}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{mdwlist}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\relax}
\usepackage{index}
\newindex{key}{kdx}{knd}{Keywords}
\newindex{author}{idx}{ind}{Authors}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\fancyfoot{}
\usepackage{ifpdf}
\ifpdf
%\usepackage[activate]{pdfcprot}
%\usepackage[owner=Tapioka, print=true, copy=true, edit=false, annotate=false,set]{pdfcrypt}
%encryption: not supported any more (since pdftex 1.10)
\usepackage[pdftex]{thumbpdf}
\usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref}
\hypersetup{pdftitle={Rational Natural Resource Use vs. Property Rights on Private Agricultural Land in Brazil},pdfauthor={Andre Luiz Aidar Alves, Alcido Elenor Wander},pdfsubject={Tropentag 2016: Abstract},pdfkeywords={Agricultural property, institutional framework, social function of land},pdfpagemode=None,colorlinks=true}
\else
\usepackage{ae}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\fi
\begin{document}
\ifpdf
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.jpg}}}
\else
\parbox[b]{2.5cm}{\resizebox*{2.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{dtt2016.eps}}}
\fi
\hfill
\parbox[b]{13.4cm}{\centering \large{\textbf{Tropentag, September 18-21, 2016, Vienna, Austria}}\\[1ex] \Large{``Solidarity in a competing world ---\\fair use of resources''\\[2ex]}}
\hspace{0.1cm}
\begin{center}
\Large{\textbf{Rational Natural Resource Use vs. Property Rights on Private Agricultural Land in Brazil\footnote{\textbf{Contact Address:} Alcido Elenor Wander, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), National Rice and Beans Research Center (CNPAF), Rodovia GO-462, km 12, 75375-000~Santo Antonio de Goias, Brazil, \mbox{e-mail}: \email{alcido.wander@embrapa.br}}\\[0.8ex]}}
\normalsize{\textsc{Andre Luiz Aidar Alves$^{1}$, Alcido Elenor Wander$^{2}$}}
\end{center}
\begin{itemize*}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{1}$Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Goias (PUC/GO), Brazil}}}
\item[]{\small{\textit{$^{2}$Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), National Rice and Beans Research Center (CNPAF), Brazil}}}
\end{itemize*}
\index[author]{Alves, Andre Luiz Aidar}
\index[author]{Wander, Alcido Elenor}
\begin{center}
\vspace{1.1cm}
\textbf{Abstract}
\begin{abstract}
\normalsize{
The property right on private properties in Brazil is not absolute. It is only guaranteed if its social function according to the Federal Constitution of 1988 is assured. One of the most important criteria established by legislation to determine the fulfilment of the social function of property, mainly rural, is precisely the rational use of natural resources within the property, thus ensuring environmental preservation for future generations. The purpose of this article is therefore to demonstrate the importance of rational use of natural resources and how this practice defines the fulfilment of the social function of property in accordance with Brazilian law. Following the national constitution, all sub"=national legislation reaffirm this commitment to the future, determining that it is considered appropriate to use the natural resources available when the operation is done respecting the natural vocation of the land in order to maintain the productive potential of the property. And it goes further, establishing as a penalty for non"=compliance with the social function of the loss of property rights through administrative expropriation process for agrarian reform purposes. Thus, according to the Brazilian constitutional law, property rights does not deserve legal protection when the owner uses the natural resources in their rural property irrational and predatory manner, thereby not complying with the social function that it was expected. Thus, it is clear that the Brazilian legislation raised the environmental protection to constitutional level, in order to ensure the preservation of the public good like natural resources for future generations. One of the mechanisms used to give effect to such a guarantee was precisely the subject of the protection of private property, especially in rural areas, the proper use of natural resources that it can be exploited. Thus, only fulfils its social function to property that has its ecological content rationally used.}

\vspace{0.5cm}
\end{abstract}
\end{center}
\noindent \textbf{Keywords:} Agricultural property, institutional framework, social function of land
\index[key]{Agricultural!property}
\index[key]{Institutional!framework}
\index[key]{Social!function of land}
\end{document}
