next up previous contents index
Next: Joaquín Castro-Montoya, Veerle Fievez, Up: Posters Previous: Israel Yerena Yamallel, Javier   Contents   Index

Andressa Natel, Rafael Canonenco Araujo, Tiago Prado Paim, Maria Regina Santos Rodeiro Peçanha, Carina Nazato, Adibe L. Abdalla:
Effect of Nitrate Supplemented to Diets Differing in Concentrate to Forage Ratio on Methane Production in vitro

[*]

ANDRESSA NATEL, RAFAEL CANONENCO ARAUJO, TIAGO PRADO PAIM, MARIA REGINA SANTOS RODEIRO PEÇANHA, CARINA NAZATO, ADIBE L. ABDALLA
3#3University of São Paulo, Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Brazil
4#4Grasp Ind. & Com. Ltda, Division of Research and Development, Brazil

Dietary nitrate has been gaining attention due to its persistent methane mitigation and the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of encapsulated nitrate as soybean meal replacer in diets contrasting in concentrate:forage ratio on ruminal fermentation and methane production by using the in vitro semi-automatic gas production technique. This study was conducted at Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, CENA/USP, in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. A randomised complete block design in a 29#94 factorial arrangement with two types of diet (20:80 and 80:20 concentrate:forage ratio) and three levels of encapsulated nitrate inclusion (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5% in dietary DM) was applied. There were four different inoculums, each inoculum considered as a block. Encapsulated nitrate replaced soybean meal to achieve isonitrogenous diets (13% CP). After 24 h of incubation, there was a diet 9#9 nitrate interaction (25#25) for methane production (mL/g OM degraded and mL/g NDF degraded). Diets with 20% concentrate reduced (28#28) the gas production and methane by 58% and 62%, respectively, when compared to the contrasting diets. There was a linear reduction in CH29#29 production with addition of encapsulated nitrate to both diets, reaching a reduction of 60% when comparing the contrasting diets with 4.5% and 0% of encapsulated nitrate. Encapsulated nitrate didn't affect degradability of organic matter, so that increasing the nitrate content did not affect the availability of the substrate for fermentation. The replacement of soybean by encapsulated nitrate in protein equivalent was able to reduce the CH29#29 emission, particularly in diets with 20% concentrate without affecting the degradability of organic matter.



Keywords: Gas production, greenhouse gas, methanogens, rumen fermentation


Footnotes

...P[*]
Contact Address: Andressa Natel, University of São Paulo, Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, Laboratory of Animal NutritionRegente Feijó 2166, 13460-580 Piracicaba, Brazil, e-mail: natel@cena.usp.br

next up previous contents index
Next: Joaquín Castro-Montoya, Veerle Fievez, Up: Posters Previous: Israel Yerena Yamallel, Javier   Contents   Index
Andreas Deininger, September 2014